|
|
Features
Gender & Governance
The Sexual Offence Act and the power to protect Kenyans from themselves
| The Sexual Offence Act and the power to protect Kenyans from themselves |
|
|
|
| Written by Association of Media Women in Kenya | |
|
The Sexual Offences Act is a timely piece of legislation which other than comprehensively providing for all conceivable sexual offences and prescribing stiff sentences to perpetrators, also interestingly protects society not only from would be offenders but also from itself. Take the case of Purity Waithera (not her real name) who is a 15 year-old mentally handicapped girl and living with her grandmother. One day in November 2005, as Purity was playing by the roadside with her friends; Eric Mwangi (not his real name) who was passing by the roadside saw her and convinced her to take a walk with him. He took her into a nearby coffee plantation and defiled her repeatedly. Purity was found six hours later and taken home where she was bathed and her wounds treated. The matter was reported to the police and after Purity’s friends identified Eric Mwangi, he was arrested and charged with defilement. However, the case did not progress to full hearing as crucial exhibits were misplaced by the police and in the meantime Purity had conceived as a result of the defilement. Purity’s grandmother grew weary with the tedious Court process and decided to drop charges against Eric after he accepted to take parental responsibility for the child and after agreeing to pay Purity’s grandmother some compensation for costs incurred in the case. Eric has since absconded after the charges were withdrawn against him and Purity’s grandmother has not received any money as agreed. Had this case been instituted under the Sexual Offences Act, Purity’s grandmother would not have been able to drop the charges against Eric as this decision rests solely with the Attorney General by virtue of Section 40 of the Act. Similarly the police officer and prosecutor who were negligent in preserving the exhibits would be culpable by virtue of Section 37 which criminalizes interference with evidence relating to a commission of a crime. As we all herald the passing of this Act as a milestone in Kenya’s legislative history we must realize that the Act itself cannot prevent incidences of sexual violence and protect survivors within the Court system especially if the general public is not aware of their rights under the Act and the obligation and duties imposed on the state therein. It is then incumbent on us all to ensure that every Kenyan is aware of this Act and is familiar as much as possible with the provisions therein because you and I might one day be in the same shoes as Purity or her grandmother. SALIENT PROVISIONS IN THE ACT
|